NAME: Halff, Allison
TOPIC: Educational Theory and Practice
CITATION
TNTP. (2021, May 23). Accelerate, don’t remediate: New evidence from elementary math classrooms. TNTP. https://tntp.org/publications/view/teacher-training-and-classroom-practice/accelerate-dont-remediate
SUMMARY
TNTP (formerly called The New Teacher Project) presents research from Zearn, an education technology company, whose math program is used in 25 percent of elementary schools. Researchers used data from the program to compare how students responded to remediation versus acceleration. Remediation is the practice of going back to previous years and covering all missing knowledge and material, before moving on to grade level work. Acceleration refers to the practice of beginning with grade level work and going back to fill in gaps, where necessary. researchers found that students performed much better in accelerated classrooms and learned more than peers who started at the same level but were given remedial instruction. Additionally, they found that these effects were particularly pronounced for low-income students and students of color, but that these populations were more likely to receive remediation than higher income, white students.
EVALUATION
The issue of filling in education gaps obviously has huge ramifications at this moment in time, as large numbers of students are likely to have knowledge gaps from their pandemic year of remote or hybrid learning. It feels a little counterintuitive to suggest that remediation is not helpful, so this data should help educators make better informed choices on how to account for learning gaps. Moving forward, while making plenty of space to mindfully return to previous years’ material will be the most beneficial way to help students remain or get on grade level. As with all instruction, this type of learning must be differentiated and tailored for each student, all of whom may have very different experiences and content mastery from the last year.